Quarterly cost: �0
 
nonchalant-unilinear
April 18, 2024, 06:35:24 PM +0100 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
Series
S4455GPP
S4455GPW
S4466CA
S4467F1P
S4467F1W
S4467F2A
S4467F2P
S44JSMT
Recent
S44JSMT Goodwood (Circ…
S44JSMT Boreham Airfie…
S4455GPP Roy Hesketh (…
S4455GPW Roy Hesketh (…
S4466CA Bathurst
Forthcoming
S4467F1P Mont-Tremblant
S4467F1W Mont-Tremblant
S4467F2P Snetterton (L…
S4467F2A Snetterton (L…
S4455GPW Reims (1954-7…
S4455GPP Reims (1954-7…
S4466CA Michigan
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register     LM2 Replays Rules Links Circuits Teams  
Linked Events
  • S3365F1 Solitude: May 29, 2018
May 29, 2018, 10:39:03 PM +0100 - Solitude - UKGPL Season 33 (2018) 1965 F1
Driver
 Team
Nat. Make Model Class Qualifying Race
Tyres Pos Time/Gap Pos Time/Gap Laps Stops Best Retirement
reason
Ballast
Robert Fleurke
 Antipasti Racing
Cooper T77 (Climax) F1 1965 1 3:38.215
117.047mph
1 51:38.609
115.400mph
14 3:38.011
117.156mph
Dunlop  
uli
 
Honda RA272 F1 1965 2 +0.291
116.891mph
2 +27.530
114.384mph
14 3:40.912
115.618mph
Goodyear  
DLogan
 
Brabham BT7 (Climax) F1 1965 17 3 +1:17.983
112.567mph
14 3:43.189
114.438mph
Dunlop  
AnGex
 Black Night Racing
Lotus 33 (Climax 1965) F1 1965 8 +6.707
113.557mph
4 +1:21.910
112.428mph
14 3:43.329
114.367mph
Dunlop  
bagrupp
 Team Groundhog
Brabham BT7 (Climax) F1 1965 6 +5.949
113.941mph
5 +1:28.094
112.210mph
14 3:41.816
115.147mph
Dunlop  
Doni Yourth
 Blue Moose Racing
Brabham BT7 (Climax) F1 1965 10 +7.763
113.026mph
6 +1:29.826
112.149mph
14 3:41.287
115.422mph
Dunlop  
miner2049er
 Clark-Hill Racing
Brabham BT11 (Climax) F1 1965 5 +5.840
113.996mph
7 +2:08.320
110.811mph
14 3:45.617
113.207mph
Goodyear  
Phil Thornton
 Antipasti Racing
Ferrari 512 F1 1965 14 +14.185
109.903mph
8 +3:07.249
108.824mph
14 3:48.168
111.941mph
Dunlop  
francesco
 Antipasti Racing
Honda RA272 F1 1965 11 +9.157
112.333mph
9 +3:15.751
108.543mph
14 3:48.938
111.565mph
Goodyear  
dave curtis
 Black Night Racing
Ferrari 512 F1 1965 13 +13.370
110.290mph
10 +3:23.622
108.284mph
14 3:50.765
110.681mph
Dunlop  
Jack O'Ferrall
 Reed Racing
BRM P261 (1965) F1 1965 12 +11.131
111.366mph
11 +3:25.683
108.217mph
14 3:49.260
111.408mph
Dunlop  
Billy Nobrakes
 Black Night Racing
Brabham BT7 (Climax) F1 1965 15 +15.699
109.191mph
12 +1L
105.733mph
13 3:53.350
109.455mph
Dunlop  
MagicArsouille
 
Lotus 33 (Climax 1965) F1 1965 3 +1.497
116.249mph
13 +8L
114.329mph
6 3:39.896
116.152mph
Disco
Dunlop  
Carlos Cendejas
 
Ferrari 512 F1 1965 7 +6.390
113.717mph
14 +10L
109.755mph
4 3:48.679
111.691mph
Disco
Dunlop  
Cookie
 Antipasti Racing
BRM P261 (1965) F1 1965 4 +2.352
115.799mph
15 +14L
---
0 ---
---
Disco
Dunlop  
bagrupp
 Team Groundhog
Brabham BT11 (Climax) F1 1965 16 DNS ---
---
Goodyear  
DLogan
 
Brabham BT7 (Climax) F1 1965 9 +7.019
113.399mph
17 ---
---
Dunlop  
60fps UKGPL8
 
Brabham BT7 (Climax) F1 1965 16 18 ---
---
Dunlop  
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
Author Topic: UKGPL Season 33 (2018) 1965 F1 - Solitude - May 29  (Read 2168 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
miner2049er
Former UKGPL Moderators
Sr. Member
**
Posts: 1972



View Profile WWW
« Reply #15 on: May 31, 2018, 10:49:05 AM +0100 »

Thanks Phil, I was a bit surprised to start as high as 5th but was happy with a PB in Qually.

The race started well and I was racing with some of the Ams but then got hit and launched skyward at about a thrid distance. I didn't need to reset but the car felt a bit squiffy after that. I was able to push but I couldn't get any heat in the tyres and lacked some grip so I couldn't really push the lap times too much. Luckily my good early laps had built a gap behind and I was able to try and keep it going as the other Ams had their own battles.

It was a lonely race after that and I had a couple of moments, once when I mounted the bales at T3 but was able to reverse off them and I did a perfect priouette at one point without hitting anything. Luckily for me because I ripped the wheels off on the very last lap and had to reset. (I will need 15 seconds adding in lieu of my missed SnG).


I do have a question: I was racing with the Ams early on and fought for position but is there a rule or implied etiquette that I should let them go and not race them as they are in a different race effectively?
Logged

Phil Thornton
UKGPL Consigliere
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 8026


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: May 31, 2018, 08:52:53 PM +0100 »

I do have a question: I was racing with the Ams early on and fought for position but is there a rule or implied etiquette that I should let them go and not race them as they are in a different race effectively?
I think you mean the Div 1 Pro drivers. They are in their own race but there is no reason why you shouldn't try to race with them provided you do it fairly. I'm sure most of the Pro drivers would appreciate a dice with a competitive but honourable driver. I doubt they would appreciate being punted off by an Intermediate or Amateur over-driving beyond their abilities.
Logged
miner2049er
Former UKGPL Moderators
Sr. Member
**
Posts: 1972



View Profile WWW
« Reply #17 on: May 31, 2018, 10:48:09 PM +0100 »

I think you mean the Div 1 Pro drivers.

I do, yes.

I'm sure most of the Pro drivers would appreciate a dice with a competitive but honourable driver. I doubt they would appreciate being punted off by an Intermediate or Amateur over-driving beyond their abilities.

That's what I thought. I tend to do most of my punting in 55s Smiley
Logged

Billy Nobrakes
UKGPL Divisional Moderator
UKGPL Moderators
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3319



View Profile
« Reply #18 on: June 11, 2018, 07:18:55 PM +0100 »

Mike, I am not moderating this series but the guidance for the 67s is that slower Privateers should be courteous being lapped but are free to race if it is for track position. With the token system there are probably going to be cases where the better Amateurs will be on par with some of the Pros.
Logged

Leading from the back at Black Night Racing
miner2049er
Former UKGPL Moderators
Sr. Member
**
Posts: 1972



View Profile WWW
« Reply #19 on: June 11, 2018, 07:21:14 PM +0100 »

Mike, I am not moderating this series but the guidance for the 67s is that slower Privateers should be courteous being lapped but are free to race if it is for track position. With the token system there are probably going to be cases where the better Amateurs will be on par with some of the Pros.

Thanks Billy.
Logged

Cookie
UKGPL Divisional Moderator
UKGPL Moderators
Hero Member
****
Posts: 6212


Chris Amon fan


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: June 11, 2018, 07:29:31 PM +0100 »

As there are 2 separate championships for Pro/Ams
an Ams driver should not defend his position hard versus a fast upcomming pro driver as he is not racing him for position!

I am not happy with this solution, but we will not tolerate blocking slow driver in fast cars...
Logged

Axel "Cookie"

poor, he who sees no stars without the punch in the face

an aphorism of  Stanislaus Jercy Lec
Billy Nobrakes
UKGPL Divisional Moderator
UKGPL Moderators
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3319



View Profile
« Reply #21 on: June 11, 2018, 10:32:48 PM +0100 »

Happy to have a debate about this.

I was thinking of situations where the the speeds are evenly matched. There may be other circumstances where a faster driver has spun off.

We need to have a rules which are easily understood by everyone.

There are rules against blocking & weaving.
Logged

Leading from the back at Black Night Racing
miner2049er
Former UKGPL Moderators
Sr. Member
**
Posts: 1972



View Profile WWW
« Reply #22 on: June 11, 2018, 11:04:01 PM +0100 »

The incident I was referring to in particular was a battle I had with DLogan who was in the BT7 (I was in the BT11).

I felt I had the pace to take the racing line through the early part of the lap and I didn't slow to let him past as that could affect my race but once he had passed me at Schatten I let him go and he pulled away.

I don't believe I affected his race but he can comment on that if he likes.

Had I caught him I would have only attempted a pass on the straight (which my faster car would have done in the slipstream all along that loooooong section) and would have followed him through the twisty bits.

Mosport tomorrow will be a different prospect, and while I don't expect to be at the same level over a race length, there may be laps where I am being chased by Ams and if I am held up by a BT7 I feel I should be allowed to make a pass and compete in my own race. If I am forced to follow a Pro in a BT7 and not pass I could be passed myself by a chasing Amateur.


P.S.
I'm not assuming for one minute that I will be able to pass a Pro at Mosport but that is a hypothetical situation which merits some discussion, perhaps in its own thread.
Logged

maddog
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 1709


View Profile
« Reply #23 on: June 11, 2018, 11:48:33 PM +0100 »

A general comment about competing on a combined grid :

GPL flagmen don't have an Elitist flag to wave, if a higher rated driver needs some overtaking assistance. 

There are no unskilled drivers at Ukgpl  - only racers who want to race.  Cool
Logged
DLogan
Full Member
***
Posts: 712


View Profile
« Reply #24 on: June 12, 2018, 03:31:29 AM +0100 »

I don't use Prib, so I only have the pitboards and my poor memory to keep track of who's around me, and I am NOT adding keeping track of "is he an am or a pro" while trying to avoid using the chrome horn  Wink, and I do NOT expect anyone else to do so while trying not to spin in front of me. If we're of a pace (whatever the circumstances leading to), and you can defend/attack cleanly, please race me. Lapped traffic is a totally different matter.

Mike: your driving at Solitude was pro-standard, and your defense was perfectly clean. No complaints at all. (Kudos to Andreas, as well). I was kind of surprised when I didn't get immediately swamped on the straight after passing you, was settling in to spend another lap hounding you, saw you leave the door open going down to the hotel so I took advantage thinking you'd slot in behind, and heart fell when watching in mirrors.  Sad Glad you finished.
Logged
miner2049er
Former UKGPL Moderators
Sr. Member
**
Posts: 1972



View Profile WWW
« Reply #25 on: June 12, 2018, 10:41:34 AM +0100 »

An Ams driver should not defend his position hard versus a fast upcomming pro driver as he is not racing him for position!

I am not happy with this solution, but we will not tolerate blocking slow driver in fast cars...

I think that is a fair point but it ultimately comes down to common sense.

The fast approaching Pros will make mincemeat of me in any car, but as mentioned, there is a crossover with Pros in slow cars and Ams in fast cars, and that is where the discussion might be needed.

Taking the line and not spoiling your own race is very different to blocking (which we have rules for) and of course lapping cars is very different and is also covered in the rules.

Mike: your driving at Solitude was pro-standard, and your defense was perfectly clean. No complaints at all.

I'm going to print that out and keep it. Haha!

Thank you.
Logged

Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Hosted by DaveGymer.com
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.204 seconds with 55 queries.