You front guys should be running Matras to give the rest of us a chance to keep up
though its probably healthier for all if the front few break away from the pack and have their own battle
I thought the Honda is supposed to be slower than a Ferrari?
I assumed the natural pecking order was:-
Lotus 49
Eagle
Ferrari
Cooper
Mclaren
with BRM/Brabham/Honda etc all fairly similar midfield then Matra and L33 bringing up the rear?
It's highly track dependant, but I wouldn't expect the Honda to be this strong at Silverstone in GPL.
I must have just nailed the setup through luck.
Speedwise it depends on whether you're talking GPL or real life.
GPL is nearly always as follows:
Lotus
Ferrari/Eagle
Brabham
Cooper
Honda
BRM
On very fast circuits expect the Eagle to gain an advantage, on very slow tracks it's often between the Lotus and Brabham.
The Honda and BRM always suck as they made their engines from Uranium (the BRM is also very unreliable) while everyone else used ultra light aluminium.
In real life the tracks had a bigger effect.
Very fast circuits favoured the Fez, Eagle, Honda and BRM although reliability generally meant the Brabhams won if the Lotus couldn't
The Cooper had a great chassis but a 10 year old Masserati V12 which couldn't really compete with anything other than the Repco lump.
While the Lotus should be strong favourite, the 49 was too new to be reliable - it was also only rolled out in June. So most races were driven in the 43 before then. Which used the same bonkers and heavy H16 as the P83/115, hence the 33 being used at Monaco.
The Ferrari's had similar reliability issues and weren't meant to be too great to drive.
Essentially anything that wasn't a Brabham needed nursing to the end of most races, Jack won the season thanks to reliability over pace, for 69 Brabham would ditch the Repco for the Dfv, as there was nothing left to coax out of it..
The Mclaren was an also ran in 67, they only made one car and we're still learning what was needed a F1 level.