Read this first!    
 
April 25, 2024, 09:14:59 PM +0100 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
Series
Recent
Forthcoming
News: Upcoming Events are as follows: 1 - RRE/AC/ACC Sunday - No event ; 2 - GTL Monday - No event 3 - AC Wed - No event 4 - RRE Thursday - No event

RACE SERIES KEY A19=Assetto Corsa, E10=Raceroom Experience, L23=UKGTL GT Legends, LN2=Legacy NoGrip GT Legends, LNE1=Legacy NoGrip GT Legends Endurance races
 
  Start Here      Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register     LM2 Replays Downloads Rules Links Circuits Teams  
Linked Events
  • U4SG Monza: January 30, 2007
January 30, 2007, 09:00:55 PM +0000 - Monza (GP 2000-present) - UKGTR Season 4 Sprint GT
Driver
 Team
Nat. Make Model Class Qualifying Race
Tyres Pos Time/Gap Pos Time/Gap Laps Stops Best Retirement
reason
Ballast
Jeffrey
 Team Shark
Ferrari 550 Maranello (#950001) GT1 1 1:40.757
128.386mph
1 39:13.912
120.899mph
22 1:41.755
127.126mph
Michelin +17.0kg
CeeJay
 GTN Drivers Club
Ferrari 575 GTC (#4019) GT1 2 +0.209
128.120mph
2 +0.373
120.880mph
22 1:41.533
127.404mph
Michelin +9.0kg
baracus250gt
 Racin24-7
Ferrari 550 Maranello (#990037) GT1 4 +1.306
126.743mph
3 +19.060
119.928mph
22 1:42.303
126.445mph
Michelin +17.0kg
Joss
 
Lamborghini Murcielago R-GT (#3036) GT1 3 +0.593
127.634mph
4 +19.776
119.892mph
22 1:42.656
126.011mph
Michelin +10.0kg
Simon Gymer
 Team Shark Junior
Ferrari 550 Maranello (#950003) GT1 5 +1.408
126.616mph
5 +36.498
119.053mph
22 1:42.776
125.864mph
Michelin +17.0kg
FlyBri
 28CD Motorsports
Ferrari 550 Maranello (#970012) GT1 7 +1.483
126.523mph
6 +42.872
118.737mph
22 1:43.389
125.117mph
Michelin +17.0kg
stnasky
 
Dodge Viper GTS-R (#4032) GT1 9 +1.756
126.186mph
7 +44.098
118.676mph
22 1:43.382
125.126mph
Pirelli -15.0kg
LEUVEN
 Team Shark
Lamborghini Murcielago R-GT (#980001) GT1 6 +1.436
126.582mph
8 +46.420
118.561mph
22 1:42.807
125.826mph
Michelin +10.0kg
Radius
 RS Motorsport
Saleen S7-R (#4005) GT1 8 +1.746
126.199mph
9 +51.924
118.290mph
22 1:43.475
125.013mph
Pirelli +7.0kg
james
 Racin24-7
Ferrari 575 GTC (#980037) GT1 17 +2.358
125.450mph
10 +1:00.083
117.890mph
22 1:43.275
125.255mph
Michelin +9.0kg
Pedro[PL]
 28CD Motorsports
Ferrari 550 Maranello (#970012) GT1 15 +2.147
125.707mph
11 +1:09.312
117.441mph
22 1:43.927
124.470mph
Michelin +17.0kg
Carl Hart
 Racin24-7
Lamborghini Murcielago R-GT (#960037) GT1 14 +2.138
125.718mph
12 +1:16.912
117.074mph
22 1:44.334
123.984mph
Michelin +10.0kg
jan duijs
 
Saleen S7-R (#4004) GT1 18 +2.566
125.197mph
13 +1:25.805
116.647mph
22 1:44.765
123.474mph
Pirelli +7.0kg
Mark J
 Legends Racing
Ferrari 550 Maranello (#870008) GT1 16 +2.297
125.524mph
14 +1:26.317
116.623mph
22 1:43.755
124.676mph
Michelin +17.0kg
Jure
 Racin24-7
Lamborghini Murcielago R-GT (#960037) GT1 19 +3.554
124.011mph
15 +1L
115.036mph
21 1:45.559
122.545mph
Michelin +10.0kg
Paul Richards
 28CD Motorsports
Lamborghini Murcielago R-GT (#950012) GT1 13 +2.035
125.844mph
16 +8.899
114.604mph
21 1:44.304
124.020mph
Michelin +10.0kg
Jimmie
 Racin24-7
Ferrari 575 GTC (#980037) GT1 12 +1.906
126.002mph
17 +40.693
113.087mph
21 1:44.389
123.919mph
Michelin +9.0kg
linco24
 
Dodge Viper GTS-R (#4032) GT1 22 +5.179
122.109mph
18 +2L
108.679mph
20 1:46.233
121.768mph
Pirelli -15.0kg
Blunder
 Team Oldie Racing
Saleen S7-R (#990014) GT1 20 +3.991
123.494mph
19 +32.185
107.230mph
20 1:45.575
122.527mph
Pirelli +7.0kg
BigG
 RS Motorsport
Lister Storm (#4014) GT1 21 +5.073
122.231mph
20 +12L 10 1:45.665
122.422mph
unknown
Dunlop -10.0kg
Jamera
 28CD Motorsports
Ferrari 550 Maranello (#970012) GT1 21 +14L 8 1:47.802
119.995mph
unknown
Michelin +17.0kg
purdie
 Racin24-7
Lamborghini Murcielago R-GT (#960037) GT1 10 +1.757
126.185mph
22 8 1:44.234
124.103mph
suspension
Michelin +10.0kg
Enzo
 Racin24-7
Ferrari 550 Maranello (#990037) GT1 11 +1.842
126.081mph
+22L 0 ---
---
unknown
Michelin +17.0kg
SimRacing.org.uk Lap Records
GTR2
GT1
1:41.533
127.404mph
CeeJay
Race
Ferrari 575 GTC
+9.0kg
January 30, 2007, 09:00:55 PM +0000
U4SG
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 6
  Print  
Author Topic: UKGTR Season 4 Sprint GT - Monza (GP) - Jan 30  (Read 19631 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Kerr
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2485


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: January 27, 2007, 01:19:48 AM +0000 »

I don't get this new rule. I suggest sticking with the original rules and don't make any special exceptions at all



Whilst there are places at Monza where you can gain time from this, you can't gain as much as you'd think, and if you're hopping the curbs (and especially the yellow and black blocks) regularly, sooner or later you are going to get a warning from the game... and/or plant the cars firmly into the barriers or the gravel (or both).



I'm not sure on that.

On the second chicane i have found i loose 1 sec per lap  there as I follow the track and others drive through it. Some have the technique and it works every lap where as my set up often lands me in the wall! I can't master it at all but it's hard watching people gain an unfair advantage just tempts you to do it too. They obviously are not getting penalties either
Logged
Dave 'Gizmo' Gymer
Director General
SimRacing.org.uk Staff
Hero Member
****
Posts: 15100


Currum auriga quasi furtivum


View Profile WWW
« Reply #16 on: January 27, 2007, 08:49:51 AM +0000 »

I gave up racing in our Danish GTR2 league recently after finding out just how much people were corner cutting on Imola. I'm not going to race online on that track again ever.  Embarrassed

The rule was only introduced because of Imola and I've made it perfectly clear already that this is a one-off situation and that we will revisit the whole issue once we've got Monza out of the way.

On the second chicane i have found i loose 1 sec per lap  there as I follow the track and others drive through it. Some have the technique and it works every lap where as my set up often lands me in the wall! I can't master it at all but it's hard watching people gain an unfair advantage just tempts you to do it too. They obviously are not getting penalties either

That's tantamount to suggesting that we change the rule because you're not very good at setting the car up. Some people aren't very good at hopping curbs because they set the car up too stiff, but nobody has asked us to change the rules so that the curbs are out of bounds.
Logged

To finish first, first you must have fins.
Mark J
Incident Moderators
Hero Member
****
Posts: 10378


Legend in his own lunchtime


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: January 27, 2007, 01:16:27 PM +0000 »

At the risk of sticking my neck on the block Lips Sealed, i would also disagree with letting people 'cheat' just because its hard to moderate.
I totally understand the amount of work it would take to check everyone, but surely the suspects need to know that they may get caught out by someone seeing the replay or by a following car on track.
If certain people were using it as a blatant way of gaining time lap after lap or in crucial on-track fights then it is plain rule bending and should be punished accordingly, otherwise the only people being penalised are those who strived to drive within the rules.  Undecided

Of course, you guys run this show and we all have to respect your decision.  angel Wink
Logged

Paul968
Former UKGPL Moderators
Sr. Member
**
Posts: 3613



View Profile
« Reply #18 on: January 27, 2007, 01:35:53 PM +0000 »

The trouble is Mark, we have not had a single report of cutting for those races from any driver outside the moderating team, and this includes you as one of the main people who asked for the rules to be tightened in the first place IIRC. It is simply far too much work for us to check methodically - as I mentioned above, in an endurance race there is somewhere in the region of 30 hours of replay to check. Even with speeding it up, surely you don't expect us to do that do you? Another factor is that we cannot get the replay of the qual session, so we have no idea who may have cut then. We will try to find an answer, but there may not be an ideal solution to this.

Logged
Jure
Incident Moderators
Full Member
****
Posts: 807


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: January 27, 2007, 02:11:06 PM +0000 »

Ah yes, the grey zone issues, I love them.  Grin

There are two reasons for cutting track.

One, which happens often enough, is "oh ****, I missed my brake point" or "oh ****, brakes are overheating, again.". It happens - check my last Monza race.  Roll Eyes

Second one is doing it on purpose, but that's very easy to spot, since it happens more or less on every lap, besides, one can clearly see if cutting is induced by driving error (car-not-under-control  Grin ) or on purpose (car looks smooth & stable enough and yet cutting occurs).

Anyway, my point being: if one cuts track on purpose, he knows it, hence he can beat me 5 seconds per lap, but I'll still know who's "driver" and who's "ready do to anything possible to "win"". And so does he. Or she, to be politicaly corrrect. Wink

It all comes down to one's character.  Cool
Logged

Christian Szell: Oh, don't worry. I'm not going into that cavity. That nerve's already dying. A live, freshly-cut nerve is infinitely more sensitive. So I'll just drill into a healthy tooth until I reach the pulp. That is unless, of course, you can tell me that it's safe.
DynoDaz
Guest
« Reply #20 on: January 27, 2007, 03:04:06 PM +0000 »

None of us are asking you guys to watch every minute of the replays and we understand that the majority of cases of corner cutting will go unpunished.  However, relaxing the rules is not the way to go!!  At the moment corner cutting is done by the minority here.  If the penalties for consistent corner cutting are severe enough, these people might be discouraged from doing it.  Relaxing the rules will only encourage more corner cutters; those of us that try to stay within the rules might be tempted to join them because it will be the only way to compete with them on the track...
 
Logged
Paul968
Former UKGPL Moderators
Sr. Member
**
Posts: 3613



View Profile
« Reply #21 on: January 27, 2007, 04:23:19 PM +0000 »

Yes, Darren, but you then end up with a totally unfair system. You are right that it's the minority, but quite a large one - a third of the drivers in one race were cutting to some extent (more than the odd occasional mistake) and we can't just ignore half of those because we haven't got time to check. It needs to be all or nothing IMO. Even checking one driver takes about as long as it would to moderate an incident, of which there are perhaps 3-4 on average per race otherwise. I just don't have that amount of extra time to give.

Another possibility might be for drivers to act as helpers for the mods, checking for cutting, but whatever we do will take time to arrange, hence Dave's decision. I really don't think it will make a big difference over 2 races, but at least everyone will be judged the same.
Logged
Kerr
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2485


View Profile
« Reply #22 on: January 27, 2007, 10:02:22 PM +0000 »

[That's tantamount to suggesting that we change the rule because you're not very good at setting the car up. Some people aren't very good at hopping curbs because they set the car up too stiff, but nobody has asked us to change the rules so that the curbs are out of bounds.

 should have explained that a bit better. I don't just mean a slight run over the kerb, it's clearly outwith the defined contours of the track. Kerbs are fine and watch any form of motorsport and that is exactly what happens. Taking a straight line though a chicane and missing both apexes by some distance is defined as cheating.

 I understand that you have made the decision as you can't possibly check every car on every lap. Hard job, and it seems you have a lot to contend with to start with.
Logged
Dave 'Gizmo' Gymer
Director General
SimRacing.org.uk Staff
Hero Member
****
Posts: 15100


Currum auriga quasi furtivum


View Profile WWW
« Reply #23 on: January 27, 2007, 11:45:53 PM +0000 »

Let's make something else clear - our rules are at least as arbitrary as those used by the games, arguably more so.

It's not cheating as long as the rules are clear and objective - the playing field is level whether we define the limits or the game. By relying on the game to check things are arguably more fair because everyone's laps are checked all the time and there's no way to cheat by hoping to cut unnoticed.
Logged

To finish first, first you must have fins.
Kerr
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2485


View Profile
« Reply #24 on: January 28, 2007, 01:09:28 AM +0000 »

Let's make something else clear - our rules are at least as arbitrary as those used by the games, arguably more so.

It's not cheating as long as the rules are clear and objective - the playing field is level whether we define the limits or the game. By relying on the game to check things are arguably more fair because everyone's laps are checked all the time and there's no way to cheat by hoping to cut unnoticed.

 i understand what you are getting at but the rules were defined before racing started at Monza, but because they were breached the goal posts moved. It's not your fault as I must admit since being involved with this site you especially put in a great deal of effort and I have enjoyed it.

I think the guys themselves have to draw the line and play fair.
Logged
Aagramn
Former Moderators
Sr. Member
**
Posts: 1837



View Profile WWW
« Reply #25 on: January 28, 2007, 02:11:48 PM +0000 »

In the light of the large amount of corner cutting which has happened in the Endurance Masters and NGT Sprint races, for this race only, the Use Of Track Surface rules are relaxed so that GTR2 will be the sole arbiter of whether a corner has been cut.

Think it's a sensible decision given the problems we've had at the last two races. Moderating cutting incidents is very time consuming, as to see the line the driver usually takes you have to look at their entire race . I was asked to check a single driver from a GTL race once, and it took me 20-30 minutes.
Logged

Team Shark

GT Rank Name: Michael Bennett

The correct procedure is brake-swear, not swear-brake.
Mark J
Incident Moderators
Hero Member
****
Posts: 10378


Legend in his own lunchtime


View Profile
« Reply #26 on: January 28, 2007, 10:09:18 PM +0000 »

whats a sensible GT laptime around here with the ballast pack cars? And by sensible, i mean 'acheivable' to a mortal not an alien time. Tongue
Logged

Jeffrey
Director, AC
SimRacing.org.uk Staff
Hero Member
****
Posts: 7029


View Profile
« Reply #27 on: January 28, 2007, 10:24:44 PM +0000 »

whats a sensible GT laptime around here with the ballast pack cars? And by sensible, i mean 'acheivable' to a mortal not an alien time. Tongue
1:42-1:43
Logged
Joss
Full Member
***
Posts: 1273



View Profile
« Reply #28 on: January 29, 2007, 12:34:55 AM +0000 »

whats a sensible GT laptime around here with the ballast pack cars? And by sensible, i mean 'acheivable' to a mortal not an alien time. Tongue
43-44  = Sensible
42-43  = Fast
41-42  = V Fast
Sub 41 = Alien  Grin

Bear in mind these are qualy laps Wink
Logged
Blunder
iRacing Indycar Host
Incident Moderators
Full Member
****
Posts: 1267



View Profile
« Reply #29 on: January 29, 2007, 07:34:40 AM +0000 »

Morning guys!
Just thought I'd add to the excellent discussion!?

I have to say I took the kerb on the entry to both chicanes on a regular basis!?
That seems reasonable on this track!? As you say you can overdo it and the game will complain so
it's reasonably self policing I guess!?
Remember that at the back of the grid we are not always as consistant as the 'Aliens' !!
To be honest, whether I cut them or not was never my issue!? I was only fast through there when
I was precise and smooth!? which basically meant missing the kerbs!

But to go back to the basic point, I agree with Dave, relaxing the rules for this track ONLY seems a sensible
option. Thats what a moderator is for!!

Obviously I'm new to this but the beauty with this league / forum is it does seem to attract people who want to race
fairly and friendly!?

M.


Logged

I'd rather be iRacing Ovals.... Smiley     iRacing id= Martin Mason
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 6
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Hosted by DaveGymer.com
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.311 seconds with 53 queries.
anything