Quarterly cost: �0
 
nonchalant-unilinear
April 19, 2024, 07:12:37 AM +0100 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
Series
S4455GPP
S4455GPW
S4466CA
S4467F1P
S4467F1W
S4467F2A
S4467F2P
S44JSMT
Recent
S44JSMT Goodwood (Circ…
S44JSMT Boreham Airfie…
S4455GPP Roy Hesketh (…
S4455GPW Roy Hesketh (…
S4466CA Bathurst
Forthcoming
S4467F1P Mont-Tremblant
S4467F1W Mont-Tremblant
S4467F2P Snetterton (L…
S4467F2A Snetterton (L…
S4455GPP Reims (1954-7…
S4455GPW Reims (1954-7…
S4466CA Michigan
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register     LM2 Replays Rules Links Circuits Teams  
Linked Events
  • S17Dn Monza: July 07, 2009
July 07, 2009, 09:44:07 PM +0100 - Monza (GP 1955-71) - UKGPL Season 17 (2009) Novices Trophy
Driver
 Team
Nat. Make Model Class Qualifying Race
Tyres Pos Time/Gap Pos Time/Gap Laps Stops Best Retirement
reason
Ballast
Al Heller
 Clark-Hill Racing
Lotus 33 (Climax 1965) F1 1965 3 +0.666
131.801mph
1 38:03.563
129.559mph
23 1:38.193
131.001mph
Dunlop  
JamesRye
 Reed Racing
BRM P261 (1965) F1 1965 1 1:36.931
132.706mph
2 (+4) +14.872
128.721mph
23 1:37.610
131.783mph
Dunlop  
Clutch4
 Mountside Racing
Brabham BT11 (Climax) F1 1965 6 +0.823
131.589mph
3 +25.587
128.124mph
23 1:37.804
131.522mph
Dunlop  
roguk
 Clark-Hill Racing
Ferrari 512 F1 1965 2 +0.604
131.884mph
4 +30.222
127.867mph
23 1:37.934
131.347mph
Dunlop  
maestro57
 
Brabham BT11 (Climax) F1 1965 8 +0.909
131.473mph
5 +31.885
127.775mph
23 1:38.326
130.823mph
Dunlop  
vosblod
 Clark-Hill Racing
Lotus 33 (Climax 1965) F1 1965 11 +2.021
129.996mph
6 +32.102
127.763mph
23 1:38.482
130.616mph
Dunlop  
NickyIckx
 Antipasti Racing
Cooper T77 (Climax) F1 1965 5 +0.772
131.658mph
7 +32.293
127.753mph
23 1:37.758
131.583mph
Dunlop  
norbert
 Antipasti Racing
Ferrari 512 F1 1965 9 +0.958
131.407mph
8 +36.443
127.524mph
23 1:38.365
130.771mph
Dunlop  
il_lupo_mannaro
 
Ferrari 512 F1 1965 4 +0.726
131.720mph
9 +39.285
127.368mph
23 1:38.257
130.915mph
Dunlop  
BookieW
 HikiWazaRacing
Honda RA272 F1 1965 17 +4.654
126.626mph
10 +55.389
126.491mph
23 1:40.196
128.382mph
Goodyear  
G Poole
 
Brabham BT11 (Climax) F1 1965 15 +2.896
128.856mph
11 +1:16.367
125.367mph
23 1:39.355
129.468mph
Dunlop  
NHance
 Mountside Racing
Brabham BT11 (Climax) F1 1965 10 +1.401
130.815mph
12 +1:21.756
125.081mph
23 1:38.524
130.560mph
Dunlop  
bernie
 Soggy Bottom Racers Club
Cooper T77 (Climax) F1 1965 14 +2.627
129.204mph
13 (+15) +1:31.467
124.570mph
23 1:40.053
128.565mph
Dunlop  
happyal
 Clark-Hill Racing
Lotus 33 (Climax 1965) F1 1965 18 +5.755
125.269mph
14 +1:37.206
124.269mph
23 1:40.306
128.241mph
Dunlop  
Billy Nobrakes
 
BRM P261 (1965) F1 1965 16 +2.990
128.735mph
15 +1L
122.405mph
22 1:40.300
128.249mph
Dunlop  
Asbjeurn Tverberg
 
Cooper T77 (Climax) F1 1965 13 +2.283
129.652mph
16 (+6) +7L
123.894mph
16 1:39.508
129.269mph
Disco
Dunlop  
miner2049er
 Clark-Hill Racing
Lotus 33 (Climax 1965) F1 1965 7 +0.888
131.501mph
17 +11L
126.437mph
12 1:38.382
130.749mph
Disco
Dunlop  
Mark65
 
Brabham BT11 (Climax) F1 1965 12 +2.030
129.984mph
18 +21L
121.419mph
2 1:40.615
127.847mph
Disco
Dunlop  
5 UKGPL
 
Lotus 33 (Climax 1965) F1 1965 19 19 DNS ---
---
Dunlop  

Moderator's Report

Fisrtly, apologies for the delay in producing the report for this one. Jack O's fast driving in his attempts to beat Phil to second in Clubmans seems to have resulted in his PC overheating and blowing a few circuits. He should be back in action soon but, in the meantime, you'll have to put up with me.

A great drive by Al Heller saw him take his first Novices win. Seems Mike was having a bad hair day which meant Clutch's third gave him the Championship.


Server replay time: 0h05m39s

Asbjeurn rear ended Mark Minardi causing him to go off and AT's subsequent spin caught out Bernie.
Whilst Mark was braking earlier with a consequent speed differential AT should have been prepared to allow for this.

  • Asbjeurn Tverbergpenalty — Blatant Rear End Shunt — 2 places lost (plus 4 for penalty points)


Server replay time: 0h05m45s

Mike was braking later then Billy and cut across him at Parabolica forcing Billy off.
The attempted overtake was a tad ambitious, also it should be borne in mind there were yellow flags for an incident ahead.
However this was possible warp contact.
Billy is allowed a no fault Sh/R

  • Racing incident


Server replay time: 0h07m32s

Bernie rear ends Al Baldwin.
In mitigation Al braked much earlier than might be expected however Bernie should have allowed for this and Al had not significantly altered his brake point.

Bernie then did a bad rejoin taking out Billy. Bernie did not appear to be 100% in control but could have stopped rather then rejoin the track. In mitigation he was trying to rejoin off the racing line.


Server replay time: 0h07m45s

Nicky pulled out across Norbert and Norbert subsequently span.
However Nicky did leave enough room for Norbert to remain on track.

  • Racing incident


Server replay time: 0h24m10s

Al Baldwin runs wide then crosses back across Graham Poole.
Al spun and Graham could carry on.

  • Racing incident


Server replay time: 0h29m43s

Fabio has a warp collision with Clutch

  • Racing incident


Server replay time: 0h37m07s

James Rye turns in on Meastro rear-ending him.
James can clearly see Peter is there so should have taken avoiding action.

  • JamesRye (james rye)penalty — Blatant Rear End Shunt — 2 places lost (plus 2 for penalty points)


Server replay time: 0h37m07s

Bernie and Al B have a bump in what looks like a possible warp incident however Bernie should have stayed further back as he was not attempting to pass.

  • bernie (bernie65 darwin)penalty — Warp Incident Caused by Careless Driving — 1 place lost (plus 4 for penalty points)

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5]
  Print  
Author Topic: UKGPL Season 17 (2009) Novices Trophy - Monza (GP 1955-71) - Jul 7  (Read 14957 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
bernie
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3271


View Profile
« Reply #60 on: July 19, 2009, 10:58:38 PM +0100 »

Cheers guys for the comments , been away for a short break , will look at what S18 has to offer and go from there .

Logged
NickyIckx
Full Member
***
Posts: 745


View Profile
« Reply #61 on: July 20, 2009, 07:08:33 AM +0100 »

Quote
Cheers guys for the comments , been away for a short break , will look at what S18 has to offer and go from there

 Cheesy Cheesy nice to hear ya staying here for S18 Bernie !!!!!!!

( btw. I forgott to mentioned that of course I will share my Cooper setups with everybody wants to .Those are nothing special , mostly based on PJ setups ).
Logged
JamesRye
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 115


View Profile
« Reply #62 on: August 04, 2009, 04:02:09 PM +0100 »

Server replay time: 0h37m07s

James Rye turns in on Meastro rear-ending him.
James can clearly see Peter is there so should have taken avoiding action.

•JamesRye (james rye) — penalty — Blatant Rear End Shunt — 2 places lost (plus 2 for penalty points)

I think that I prefer Maestros version of events  Smiley

L22 Disaster coming into parabolica, Overtake James with the slipstream, up the inside but drift to middle of circuit and James has nowhere to go and I get a gentle tap. Shame the physics made it seem like he hit me at over 100mph. and off into gravel Again


Ryeman
Logged
bernie
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3271


View Profile
« Reply #63 on: August 04, 2009, 08:52:34 PM +0100 »

You should know by now Jack'O comes from a long line of hanging judges   Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

Dont think I ever saw so many PP's awarded for a season , as for me is 16 a record ? Its certainly a PB and flying the flag for the Soggies in the naughty boy dept.

Grats again to Clutch now ehat its all official like  Smiley Smiley Smiley

Logged
Phil Thornton
UKGPL Consigliere
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 8026


View Profile
« Reply #64 on: August 04, 2009, 10:50:04 PM +0100 »

Server replay time: 0h37m07s

James Rye turns in on Meastro rear-ending him.
James can clearly see Peter is there so should have taken avoiding action.

•JamesRye (james rye) — penalty — Blatant Rear End Shunt — 2 places lost (plus 2 for penalty points)

I think that I prefer Maestros version of events  Smiley

L22 Disaster coming into parabolica, Overtake James with the slipstream, up the inside but drift to middle of circuit and James has nowhere to go and I get a gentle tap. Shame the physics made it seem like he hit me at over 100mph. and off into gravel Again


Ryeman

I think Peter is being a gentleman but that doesn't change what happened.  There was obviously no malitious intent but there are a couple of lessons to learn here (which is one of the main reasons for moderating races). 

Peter was clearly visible in your mirrors round Ascari and he dissapeared from view which means he must have been along side.  Since we can't look over our shoulders in GPL we have to develop a "sixth sense" that enables us to know where other cars are without seeing them.  The opportunity to defend the inside line had now gone, moving over at this stage would be blocking or risking side-by-side contact.

As the overtaking car, Peter can see you and so he knows exactly where you are.  He makes a clean pass and wins the corner.  One slight criticism is that it was a bit of a block pass but if we penalized that nobody would ever get past anyone (not in World Superbikes anyway).

Having lost sight of Peter you have to assume he is along side.  If under braking he reappears in your mirrors, you can assume you have outbraked him and you are then entitled to take your normal line.  However in this case he has clearly won the corner and you have to be prepared to yeild.  As the following car you are now responsible for ensuring there is no rear end contact.  You should have been prepared to take a wide line to avoid contact.

I appreciate a penalty may seem harsh but it is the only mechanism we have to highlight incidents and to try to learn from them so we can make on-line racing more fun for everyone.

Peter's interpretation of the event is very sporting but we wouldn't want to foster a culture where it was OK to knock people off the track provided we said sorry afterwards.  Having said that we do class lots of incidents as "racing incidents" or "warp incidents" so we don't try to apportion blame in every case.  However it is important to award penalties when there is a point to debate. 

Peter is right about the physics (or warp as it may be in this case) though.  But even on this point it is the responsibility of the following driver to maintain a sufficient gap to avoid the risk of warp contact.
Logged
Jack O'Ferrall
Former UKGPL Moderators
Full Member
**
Posts: 904


View Profile
« Reply #65 on: August 04, 2009, 11:30:38 PM +0100 »

Not my handiwork this time Bernie old chum, I have had a PC fail on me, so I asked for help from our newest moderators, as trained by Phil to join the 'long line'.  I can't comment, as I haven't been able to watch the replay yet and I would have to rely on reports alone.

While there have been many penalty points awarded this season, Novices has been the only division where the entire race has been fully moderated, the others have been report-only.  Also Novices has been full grids with resets allowed, while the other divisions have tended to thin out quickly, so Novices has suffered more from the closer racing due to slipstreaming.

Though your own penalties may be put down to trying too hard in an uncompetitive chassis- we'll sort you out with a a faster car for next season -if we move to report-only for the Novices it could mean that drivers who need advice won't get it.  Some of the rejoins this season were not appropriate for league racing, at any level.  Understandably drivers are more reluctant to point out the failings of their comrades than moderators.

Any comments on the report-only issue are welcome, if there is a new influx and particularly if we move to three divisions the Novices will remain fully moderated, otherwise we might allow it to be report-only. 
Logged
vosblod
Former UKGPL Moderators
Sr. Member
**
Posts: 3488

can divide by zero


View Profile
« Reply #66 on: August 04, 2009, 11:55:14 PM +0100 »

You should know by now Jack'O comes from a long line of hanging judges   Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy
I'm afraid I'm the hanging judge Bernie.
As Jack O' says the novices gets the nits picked out of it to assist new drivers but it does mean 'apology and handshake' incidents pick up penalties.
Personally I favor reported incidents only but I understand why the Nov's is a special case...
Logged
maestro57
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 78



View Profile
« Reply #67 on: August 05, 2009, 07:15:58 AM +0100 »

Any comments on the report-only issue are welcome, if there is a new influx and particularly if we move to three divisions the Novices will remain fully moderated, otherwise we might allow it to be report-only. 

I would say the Novice division should remain fully moderated with penalties
You learn quickest when you have been slapped. Being told you were a naughty boy just doesn't have the same effect.
As Novices we need this proper guidance from the seniors so we race better and cleaner

Thanks again to the moderators for the excellent job you do.
Logged

"You win some, lose some, and wreck some."
JamesRye
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 115


View Profile
« Reply #68 on: August 05, 2009, 08:45:38 AM +0100 »

I would also say that the Novice devision should remain fully moderated with penalties. Its hard to be objective when you are involved in an incident (I came up with a barmy reason for why I had contact with Nicky at Silverstone).

Personally, I'd put this one down to a racing incident (but then I would) however, I respect the judges descision and thanks to Phil Thornton for a well reasoned judgement.

Certainly moderating is surely a difficult task, just look at some of the crazy Penalties issued in the world of real F1. The most unjust of penalties was surely disqualifying Hamilton from the win at Spa or possibly banning Renault from Valencia.

Ryeman
Logged
bernie
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3271


View Profile
« Reply #69 on: August 05, 2009, 11:28:28 AM +0100 »

I would like to add that I do fully appreciate the job the mods do though I cant help thinking a lot of the penalties that have been awarded have seemed (to my eyes)  to be a bit harsh and uneccasary , after all we want to be able to race , thats why we are here , mistakes will and are made in the learning process 

In a lot of cases I think a verbal warning would have been better applied rather than being penalised for "trying to hard "

In the real world of 60's racing there was mutual respect among drivers due to the potentialy fatal consequences of making contact , those thoughts are always in my head , I have personally witnessed tradgedy on the race track on far too many occasions and for myself I try to drive accordingly , though it isn't always clear because when close racing we are never sure how the other guy is going to react , for that reason I like to follow a slower car for a while to kind of sum up the situation and seek out a passing oppertunity , unfortunatetly this season I seem to have allowed myself to become annoyed with myself and at times become frustrated with my performance which has led to me trying to do some wonderful things with the Cooper which turned out to be beyond the understanding of the design perammeters of both GPL and the Cooper Car Company . 

 Roll Eyes



Logged
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Hosted by DaveGymer.com
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.435 seconds with 66 queries.
anything