Quarterly cost: �0
 
April 17, 2024, 12:49:15 AM +0100 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
Series
S4455GPP
S4455GPW
S4466CA
S4467F1P
S4467F1W
S4467F2A
S4467F2P
S44JSMT
Recent
S44 Silverstone (GP 19…
S44JSMT Goodwood (Circ…
S44JSMT Boreham Airfie…
S4455GPP Roy Hesketh (…
S4455GPW Roy Hesketh (…
S4466CA Bathurst
Forthcoming
S4467F1P Mont-Tremblant
S4467F1W Mont-Tremblant
S4467F2P Snetterton (L…
S4467F2A Snetterton (L…
S4455GPP Reims (1954-7…
S4455GPW Reims (1954-7…
S4466CA Michigan
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register     LM2 Replays Rules Links Circuits Teams  
Linked Events
  • S19A Mexico City: March 30, 2010
April 03, 2010, 12:03:02 AM +0100 - Mexico City (1962-1979) - UKGPL Season 19 (2010) Amateurs Trophy (65)
Driver
 Team
Nat. Make Model Class Qualifying Race
Tyres Pos Time/Gap Pos Time/Gap Laps Stops Best Retirement
reason
Ballast
EvilClive
 HikiWazaRacing
Brabham BT11 (Climax) F1 1965 1 1:51.141
100.653mph
1 37:41.636
98.925mph
20 1:52.225
99.680mph
Goodyear  
FullMetalGasket
 Black Night Racing
Brabham BT11 (Climax) F1 1965 2 +0.597
100.115mph
2 +7.812
98.585mph
20 1:51.731
100.121mph
Goodyear  
john roberts
 
Brabham BT11 (Climax) F1 1965 3 +0.665
100.054mph
3 +14.068
98.314mph
20 1:52.481
99.454mph
Goodyear  
G Jonsson
 
Brabham BT11 (Climax) F1 1965 4 +1.292
99.496mph
4 +30.399
97.613mph
20 1:53.189
98.831mph
Goodyear  
NickyIckx
 Antipasti Racing
Brabham BT11 (Climax) F1 1965 6 +1.808
99.041mph
5 +31.639
97.560mph
20 1:52.996
99.000mph
Goodyear  
Clutch4
 Mountside Racing
Lotus 33 (Climax 1965) F1 1965 8 +2.658
98.302mph
6 +45.242
96.985mph
20 1:53.857
98.252mph
Dunlop  
kinghiro
 Clark-Hill Racing
BRM P261 (1965) F1 1965 5 +1.746
99.096mph
7 +49.540
96.805mph
20 1:53.562
98.507mph
Dunlop  
Al Heller
 Clark-Hill Racing
BRM P261 (1965) F1 1965 7 +2.140
98.751mph
8 +52.124
96.697mph
20 1:54.002
98.127mph
Dunlop  
fpolicardi
 Team7
Brabham BT11 (Climax) F1 1965 12 +5.116
96.223mph
9 +56.677
96.507mph
20 1:53.042
98.960mph
Goodyear  
JamesRye
 Reed Racing
BRM P261 (1965) F1 1965 9 +3.064
97.952mph
10 +1:05.645
96.135mph
20 1:54.185
97.969mph
Dunlop  
b_1_rd
 Clark-Hill Racing
Lotus 33 (Climax 1965) F1 1965 10 +3.532
97.552mph
11 +1:05.911
96.124mph
20 1:54.156
97.994mph
Dunlop  
Phil Thornton
 Antipasti Racing
Ferrari 512 F1 1965 13 +6.600
95.011mph
12 +1L
90.645mph
19 1:56.547
95.984mph
Dunlop  
bernie
 Soggy Bottom Racers Club
Lotus 33 (Climax 1965) F1 1965 11 +4.039
97.123mph
13 +16L
92.766mph
4 1:56.562
95.972mph
Disco
Dunlop  
2 UKGPL_T7
 
BRM P261 (1965) F1 1965 14 14 DNS ---
---
Dunlop  

Moderator's Report

Summary

A flag to flag victory for Evil Clive confirming his dominance in qualifying. Tim Muttram battled hard to pick up second place with John Roberts securing the final podium place.


Server replay time: 0h04m39s

Evil Clive – Main Straight – Laps 3, 4 and 5

When trying to make a break at the front of the pack, Evil moves off the racing line and back on again whilst being tailed by John Roberts down the main straight.

The rules clearly state that blocking and weaving is not allowed but the rules do allow a driver to move off the racing line and back on again once per straight section (see the rules on Etiquette and the Penalty Guidelines on Blocking/Weaving). The rules are intended to cater for situations where a driver may be in a position to overtake, they are not intended to apply to situations where a car is a long way back (as a rule of thumb greater than five car lengths would constitute a long way back).

By the letter of the law, Clive did nothing wrong; he only moved off the racing line and back on once, and in all cases the following car was at least five car lengths behind anyway. However weaving in order to break the tow is not a tactic we wish to encourage at UKGPL. Rather than create a rule for this sort of scenario, in the interests of close, safe racing drivers are requested not to weave in order to break a tow. If weaving to break a tow becomes widespread, a rule outlawing it may have to be introduced.

  • Racing incident

Pages: 1 2 [3]
  Print  
Author Topic: UKGPL Season 19 (2010) Amateurs Trophy (65) - Mexico City - Mar 30  (Read 12290 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
kinghiro
Full Member
***
Posts: 228


View Profile
« Reply #30 on: April 02, 2010, 01:45:49 AM +0100 »

I had a fantastic start. I think my clutchbutton got stuck or something cause my car did not move.(maybe some sticky stuff went down there during years of pornsurfing angel).I went out last and passed nick on the grass.He was very eager to pass me again and I didn t want to stay in the way. After some laps behind a very descent Phil who also tried to let me pass when I didn t mean to I got through and worked my way up to hmmm 7 th I think. Had a nice battle with Rye wich unfortunatly ended with a spin for him. Thx for clean racing to those I overtook.
oh almost forgot racelength: No big surprise for anyone I guess that I would love to have the 50 minutes instead of "long".I saw it would be fixed, but still felt for putting in a "vote".
« Last Edit: April 02, 2010, 01:52:43 AM +0100 by kinghiro » Logged
Phil Thornton
UKGPL Consigliere
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 8026


View Profile
« Reply #31 on: April 02, 2010, 12:39:42 PM +0100 »

Not sure what happened to my inauspicious Amatures debut , combination of an unfamiliar car , (not sure if the Lotus was the right choice)  and a shortage of wheel time but I understeered right into a brick wall at the kink before the hairpin when trying to defend my next to last place  Smiley
I was as disappointed as you Bernie.  I was hoping for a battle with someone for the wooden spoon LOL.  It's normally mine by default. wheelchair

Quote
How you guys are getting those brabs and brm's into the 51's is beyond me , I was way off the mark , maybe its a combination of my driving talent and the Mexican food , will stay off the jumping beans next time  Embarrassed
Yes amazing times, but something for us to aim at  Roll Eyes
Logged
bernie
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3271


View Profile
« Reply #32 on: April 02, 2010, 01:54:31 PM +0100 »

Maybe we could have relived the Clubmans Cup , won't forget the great racing we had   Grin
Logged
Statmeister
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 54



View Profile
« Reply #33 on: April 03, 2010, 03:29:07 PM +0100 »

Here's some additional stats for Mexico (subject to race moderation).

The opening round of the 4th Am's season & Evil Clive's victory moves him into second spot in the list of the division's alltime winners with 5 wins.
And for today's random stat, the only drivers to have won more than 1 Am's race are:

1. Hristo Itchov (9)
2. Evil Clive (5)
3. Full Metal Gasket (4)
4. Fulvio Policardi (3)
=5. John Roberts / Natan (2)
 
As far as the Statmeister challenge goes, not only did Evil Clive manage to lap more consistently than anyone else but he also claimed the quickest average laptime (1:52.836)



Details of what this is all about here
« Last Edit: April 12, 2010, 10:39:54 PM +0100 by Statmeister » Logged
b_1_rd
Former UKGPL Moderators
Full Member
**
Posts: 1182


View Profile
« Reply #34 on: April 05, 2010, 08:55:16 PM +0100 »

Hmm, interesting stat!  Remind me again why we run handicapped chassis!?!  Tongue
Logged

Steve

Remember, you’re an individual, just like everyone else.
JamesRye
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 115


View Profile
« Reply #35 on: April 06, 2010, 03:32:35 PM +0100 »

Statmeister,

I like these stats, it is good to see how consistently inconsistent I am  Wink

Cheers,

Jim
Logged
JamesRye
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 115


View Profile
« Reply #36 on: April 09, 2010, 03:31:27 PM +0100 »

Not sure if this is the place to post, but what sort of times are people managing around Keimola.

I have done 10 laps with a modified Zandvoort setup and can scrape a 1:22.00

Hoping that this will be a mid-grid laptime?

James
Logged
b_1_rd
Former UKGPL Moderators
Full Member
**
Posts: 1182


View Profile
« Reply #37 on: April 19, 2010, 01:21:05 AM +0100 »

Quote
Rather than create a rule for this sort of scenario, in the interests of close, safe racing drivers are requested not to weave in order to break a tow. If weaving to break a tow becomes widespread, a rule outlawing it may have to be introduced.

I'm a little confused.  I know, doesn't take much!  Tongue

I admit to have done this occasionally in previous races, is it allowed or not?  Huh
Logged

Steve

Remember, you’re an individual, just like everyone else.
Hristo Itchov
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3965


There is no limit!


View Profile WWW
« Reply #38 on: April 19, 2010, 02:44:16 AM +0100 »

I think it's OK to try and break a tow (though it's not really effective most of the time), as long as you pick up a line well in advance before a braking zone and thus not surprise the driver behind. So as long as it's on a straight and as long as you're not doing it when the other car is too close, I don't see a problem.
Logged

Clive Loynes
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4680



View Profile
« Reply #39 on: April 19, 2010, 08:17:45 AM +0100 »

Me neither H.   Grin

I’ve never had a problem with people weaving to break a tow but I would have said that it is a matter of distinguishing between weaving to break a tow and weaving to block.

Nothing wrong with the former but the latter is a heinous crime that gets everybody hot under the collar.

The difference is just a matter of who moves first. If the bloke in front moves out of the path of the bloke behind, where is the problem?

If the bloke behind moves across the track to make a passing attempt and the bloke in front also moves over, then that is blocking.

When the car behind is getting close and is about to move but the bloke in front moves over, then basically he has done the guy behind a favour.  However, as the lead car moves over he will have moved the other car into his blind spot and will have to cease his wanderings back and forth as he must assume that the other car is alongside.

It is probably the last point that causes the problem.  Some drivers have difficulty in “acknowledging” that the other car is alongside, even when it’s the other car that has done all the work and made his intentions crystal clear.  What chance does he stand of accepting where the other car is when he has confused the situation still further?

One thing about weaving to break a tow in GPL, or any other sim, is that it’s safe enough in a fight between two drivers who know what they are doing.  Lob a third car in there and it really shouldn’t be indulged in.  There is no way that you can always know where both of the other cars have got to.
Logged

SBRC  UKPnG Season 6, 7 & 8 Champions (Missed Season 9 by a gnat's nadger!)
Hristo Itchov
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3965


There is no limit!


View Profile WWW
« Reply #40 on: April 19, 2010, 12:39:31 PM +0100 »

I couldn't have said it better, Clive. I wish the FIA were not as dumb and adopt the same view instead of just calling "weaving" any two times (or more) a car changes its position on the road or saying they don't want to encourage breaking the tow. The morons should look at their stupid rules about aerodynamics instead...
« Last Edit: April 19, 2010, 08:53:22 PM +0100 by Hristo Itchov » Logged

Phil Thornton
UKGPL Consigliere
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 8026


View Profile
« Reply #41 on: April 19, 2010, 07:49:19 PM +0100 »

There has been some lengthy discussions on the mods forum about breaking a tow. 

We have a clear rule about weaving to block.

We don't have any rules about weaving to break a tow.

I suggest we wouldn't want a group of drivers weaving down long straights like a snake, that is likely to end in crashes.  It hasn't happened as far as I can recall.  If it does, then we may want to change the rules.

At the end of the day trying to break the tow will only delay the inevitable IMO.  If the following car is faster they will catch up anyway.  If the following car needs the tow to get on terms, they won't pull away if they eventually overtake.  It should be relatively easy for the overtaken car to retake the position.  So IMO it would be better if we didn't bother trying to break a tow, if you are genuinely quicker you shouldn't need to.

Rest assured we won't introduce a rule on this without widespread consultation (and certainly not mid season).  If the drivers are happy with the rules as they stand then the rules will not be changed.  However if the moderators are regularly faced with incidents caused by "excessive weaving" (whatever we determine that to be) then we would have to introduce a rule for the guidance (and sanity) of the moderators.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Hosted by DaveGymer.com
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.36 seconds with 53 queries.