Quarterly cost: �0
 
nonchalant-unilinear
May 02, 2024, 01:06:29 PM +0100 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
Series
S4455GPP
S4455GPW
S4466CA
S4467F1P
S4467F1W
S4467F2A
S4467F2P
S44JSMT
Recent
S4467F1W Mont-Tremblant
S4467F1P Mont-Tremblant
S4467F2P Snetterton (L…
S4467F2A Snetterton (L…
S4455GPP Reims (1954-7…
S4455GPW Reims (1954-7…
S4466CA Michigan
Forthcoming
S4467F1W Aintree
S4467F1P Aintree
S4467F2P Sempione (193…
S4467F2A Sempione (193…
S4455GPP Oakes Field
S4455GPW Oakes Field
S4466CA Salzburgring
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register     LM2 Replays Rules Links Circuits Teams  
Linked Events
  • S23GT Spa: October 07, 2012
October 07, 2012, 09:37:05 PM +0100 - Spa (GPL) - UKGPL Season 23 (2012) GT Team Challenge
Driver
 Team
Nat. Make Model Class Qualifying Race
Tyres Pos Time/Gap Pos Time/Gap Laps Stops Best Retirement
reason
Ballast
JonnyO
 Bandit GT
Porsche 910 GT 1967 10 +19.673
142.306mph
1 57:31.016
137.078mph
15 3:41.788
142.196mph
Dunlop  
Cookie
 GT International GT
Chaparral Mk2D GT 1967 3 +3.042
153.852mph
2 +7L
144.655mph
8 3:28.163
151.503mph
Disco
Firestone  
FullMetalGasket
 Green GT
Ford GT40 MkI GT 1967 8 +12.631
146.976mph
3 +48.571
140.735mph
8 3:33.109
147.987mph
Disco
Goodyear  
BadBlood
 Fujikawa Racing GT
Ferrari 330/P4 GT 1967 11 +24.828
139.071mph
4 +2:31.900
133.066mph
8 3:40.106
143.282mph
Disco
Firestone  
Doni Yourth
 Fujikawa Racing GT
Ford GT40 MkIIB GT 1967 5 +6.728
151.134mph
5 +8L
141.200mph
7 3:31.013
149.457mph
Disco
Goodyear  
clouds
 GT International GT
Lola T70 MkIII GT 1967 2 +0.789
155.562mph
6 +10L
142.472mph
5 3:25.756
153.275mph
Disco
Goodyear  
Phil Thornton
 Green GT
Mirage M1 GT 1967 6 +9.475
149.170mph
7 +43.801
137.049mph
5 3:32.626
148.323mph
Disco
Firestone  
Geoff65
 HikiWaza GT
Ford GT40 MkIIB GT 1967 9 +15.560
144.997mph
8 +1:32.305
131.505mph
5 3:41.021
142.689mph
Disco
Goodyear  
Al Heller
 Bandit GT
Ferrari 330/P4 GT 1967 4 +3.472
153.530mph
9 +11L
137.216mph
4 3:28.063
151.576mph
Disco
Firestone  
Hristo Itchov
 HikiWaza GT
Chaparral Mk2F GT 1967 1 3:21.943
156.169mph
10 +12L
136.695mph
3 3:25.990
153.101mph
Disco
Firestone  
EvilClive
 Fujikawa Racing GT
Ford GT40 MkI GT 1967 7 +11.852
147.512mph
11 +14L
110.346mph
1 4:50.087
108.717mph
Disco
Goodyear  
2 UKGPL_T7
 
Porsche 910 GT 1967 12 12 DNS ---
---
Dunlop  

Moderator's Report

This race sufered from a mass disco. Therefore the race is considered as a "no-race" .
The result is void and we will attempt a re-run at the end of this season.

I think that the reason for the disco is unlikely to be the circuit as it is an original Papyrus track and can be considered "safe".

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4
  Print  
Author Topic: UKGPL Season 23 (2012) GT Team Challenge - Spa - Oct 7  (Read 9526 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Cookie
UKGPL Divisional Moderator
UKGPL Moderators
Hero Member
****
Posts: 6227


Chris Amon fan


View Profile
« Reply #30 on: October 08, 2012, 06:36:20 PM +0100 »

Yes, Tim I am with you!

So far the problems were only selfmade with GLWait.

The only problem I see at Spa is the driving through the pitlane of some guys...

I also have the fear of not reaching my pitbox if some others do allready stop.
Logged

Axel "Cookie"

poor, he who sees no stars without the punch in the face

an aphorism of  Stanislaus Jercy Lec
FullMetalGasket
Director, AC
SimRacing.org.uk Staff
Hero Member
****
Posts: 4238



View Profile
« Reply #31 on: October 08, 2012, 07:10:23 PM +0100 »

At Spa the issue of someone being in/near your spot isn't so important. If you abort and continue it'll only cost you 2 or 3 seconds Smiley
Logged
Doni Yourth
Full Member
***
Posts: 1296


View Profile
« Reply #32 on: October 08, 2012, 07:44:58 PM +0100 »

Just did a quickie online test with a UKGPL server featuring Axel, Evil and Alain Maurice.

Failure.  Sad

For my handicaps to work, they must be employed prior to the member starting.  GPL apparently has a cut-off of three minutes.  If you haven't started by then, you can't at all.

End of story.  End of plan.
Logged
BadBlood
Former UKGPL Moderators
Hero Member
**
Posts: 6107


Sassafrassarassum Rick Rastardly!


View Profile WWW
« Reply #33 on: October 08, 2012, 08:22:33 PM +0100 »

Still an interesting idea Doni. I'll think about it some more...
Logged

BadBlood

aka

Angel Moose angel
GPLRank +71.5ish Smiley
GPL65Rank +71.1ish Smiley
Other ranks? Middlin' Slowish Wink
EvilClive
UKGPL Senior Consultant
UKGPL Moderators
Hero Member
****
Posts: 7756

I always play by the rules.... they are MY rules!


View Profile
« Reply #34 on: October 08, 2012, 08:31:29 PM +0100 »

Just so that everyone knows that I do sometimes consider different solutions.....lol

My intention in introducing pitstops was to try to make the actual racing last longer.

Because of the huge performance difference between the cars in GT's, it was pretty obvious that most races would be decided in the first 50% of the race as the faster cars and drivers eased away. I felt that drivers would be lucky to have any wheel to wheel racing for the last 30% of the race, which let us be honest, makes life a little boring huh?

I did consider an option like Garth has suggested, whereby we add the handicap time at the end of the race, but as Tim and Axel have already commented this would be rather artificial and require everyone to run prib and have a calculator alongside their steering wheel to work out where they might be in the race......not what I would call racing  Undecided.

 I also wondered about something along the lines of Doni's idea, but discovered that would not work either.. Sad

I wish there was an easier way to make a pitstop that did not rely on parking your car in such a precise position, but I think that it is something that gets easier and more accurate with practice.

The only option that I have up my sleeve that would work for you drivers, but would make my moderator's job a nightmare, is to introduce multiple pitstops for the faster cars with no stop longer than 25 secs. As you will already have worked out...at least those of you who selected the 2F for Spa will have spotted this I am sure.

In a 15 lap race around Spa where the 2F needs to spend 225 secs in the pits you would be stopping almost every second lap, even if the time to get in and out of the pits was factored in. Plus drivers would need to remember how many stops they had done!!!

Just for comparison......

At present the 2F requires a  single 225 second pit stop in a 15 lap race around Spa and this allows for 10 seconds lost in slowing down and speeding up again.

So, if we assume 6 stops that already accounts for 60 seconds ( 6 x slow down and speed up) leaving 175 seconds of stationary time that would mean each stop at around 29 seconds......maybe a fraction close to the 30 second disco point??
So 7 stops would be the way to go...7 x 10 seconds= 70, leaving 155 seconds of stationary time to be divided up...each of the 7 stops would be 22 secs. In a 15 lap race with a rolling start, that would put you in the pits on laps 2,4,6,8,10,12 and 14.  Is that reasonable Huh It should certainly keep the leaders in close proximity throughout the whole race, but I fear that all of those stops would deter people from even trying the 2F  or 2D?  what do you guys think???
« Last Edit: October 08, 2012, 08:38:20 PM +0100 by EvilClive » Logged

Evil Waza, now a completely reformed character!
          **NOW AVAILABLE ON TWITCH @    evilclive67
Rank   Only when I sweat
maddog
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 1709


View Profile
« Reply #35 on: October 08, 2012, 09:28:10 PM +0100 »

There was another idea put forward, to keep the racing interesting, in a GT series.  Each driver could be required to drive each car once, or more during a Season.  You could limit championship leaders to slower cars.  If pitstops threaten to kill the series, it's time to consider alternatives.
Logged
Phil Thornton
UKGPL Consigliere
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 8053


View Profile
« Reply #36 on: October 08, 2012, 09:49:13 PM +0100 »

The bit that really confused me yesterday was if the pit boxes had been moved why did the pit boards remain in the pit lane?  The reason long pit stops are feasible is if you stop in your pit box you won't get discoed.  But that assumes it is possible to identify your pit box and if we can't rely on the pit boards to help us it means long pit stops are just too risky. 

I've had a look at the track.ini file and played around with the pit stalls.  I can't work out how GPL decides where to put the pit board.  All I know is if we use the "normal" pit stall positions, I've never been discoed when I stop at my pit board.

As Clive has said, he thought about lots of different handicapping options but very few allow slow and fast cars to compete over a single race.  Over a season yes, but then drivers take turns in the faster cars and hence take turns at winning which is very boring IMO.  The problem with the GTs is that the range in performance is vast.  That was partly why the Porsche Super Cup format was used.  In a normal GT race at Spa with no handicapping who would take a Porsche?  Just taking it to collect some "tokens" or because "it was my turn" would simply produce very boring and tedious races.  At least with the pit stop format the Porsche has a genuine chance of winning a race at Spa.
Logged
Cookie
UKGPL Divisional Moderator
UKGPL Moderators
Hero Member
****
Posts: 6227


Chris Amon fan


View Profile
« Reply #37 on: October 08, 2012, 09:55:01 PM +0100 »

I think the actual system is good as it is!

The last races showed that there are good balanced handicaps given.
Of course there are some fast laps more needed for some cars on some tracks to make it better (e.g. the ChapD at Imola  Wink )

This Spa desaster was caused by the moved pit stalls, so no problem for me to repeat in the common way.
Logged

Axel "Cookie"

poor, he who sees no stars without the punch in the face

an aphorism of  Stanislaus Jercy Lec
Hristo Itchov
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3977


There is no limit!


View Profile WWW
« Reply #38 on: October 08, 2012, 09:59:57 PM +0100 »

I think the actual system is good as it is!

The last races showed that there are good balanced handicaps given.
Of course there are some fast laps more needed for some cars on some tracks to make it better (e.g. the ChapD at Imola  Wink )

This Spa desaster was caused by the moved pit stalls, so no problem for me to repeat in the common way.

Yes, I guess normally it's not an issue, however what IS an issue is serving such long pitstops if you happen to miss your pit stall. Do you reverse the car back? What if there is another car behind you? How do you creep forward over such a short pitlane when you have a near 4 minutes pitstop? My main issue is with the huge length of the pitstops, not the actual system. I liked it when it was used in 67s D1 division.

I like the alternative of using each car once per season mandatory, but it usually leads to spec racing.
Logged

maddog
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 1709


View Profile
« Reply #39 on: October 08, 2012, 10:10:58 PM +0100 »

The pitstop problem isn't with Evil's idea, it's Gpl's fault for not liking pitstops.  There's no harm in looking for something better.  A second idea would be to give everyone free car choice in race 1, and then handicap 5 pairs of drivers each race, according to championship standings, after each race. (Ignore penalties not yet assessed) I'm just suggesting, there may be alternatives, if problems continue. Smiley
« Last Edit: October 08, 2012, 10:20:06 PM +0100 by maddog » Logged
Cookie
UKGPL Divisional Moderator
UKGPL Moderators
Hero Member
****
Posts: 6227


Chris Amon fan


View Profile
« Reply #40 on: October 08, 2012, 11:11:14 PM +0100 »

I did several pitstop tests at Spa with nearly 3 min none failed!
Even one when I overshoot the board a lttle, I reversed and then pushed the start button.

I keep 1st gear, no throttle and never move.
IMO its the driver who has to learn how to stop correct.

I see the problem when there are allready several cars waiting, so I had the idea of doing another lap if this situation occurs.
Logged

Axel "Cookie"

poor, he who sees no stars without the punch in the face

an aphorism of  Stanislaus Jercy Lec
Hristo Itchov
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3977


There is no limit!


View Profile WWW
« Reply #41 on: October 08, 2012, 11:58:54 PM +0100 »

I did several pitstop tests at Spa with nearly 3 min none failed!
Even one when I overshoot the board a lttle, I reversed and then pushed the start button.

I keep 1st gear, no throttle and never move.
IMO its the driver who has to learn how to stop correct.

I see the problem when there are allready several cars waiting, so I had the idea of doing another lap if this situation occurs.

Still, it could happen that you can't stop at your pit stall, for one reason or another, and then such long pitstops are impossible to serve with a normal length pitlane.
Logged

Doni Yourth
Full Member
***
Posts: 1296


View Profile
« Reply #42 on: October 09, 2012, 12:10:25 AM +0100 »

This situation certainly does have legs, doesn't it?  All the suggestions and comments.  It's good!  Smiley

I noted above that my online test today with some UK regulars failed.  Let me clarify that with some particulars.

I knew that I could address every element of a handicap employed at the start of the race with one exception.  Otherwise, it would work like a charm.  The test would show me.

I'd have to re-write the pit stall and grid locations(in fact, they'd be identical).  NP.  I've done this dozens of times for the ADC.  The only real doubt was how long after the green flag falls does a user have to enter the race(via the green button).  I expect that you all know all too well that if you don't make the grid before the green flag falls that the button disappears but it does come back after about 15-16 seconds.  You get a late start from your pit stall.  This was the key to my invoking the handicaps.

For a race, nobody would go to the grid.  Everyone just stays back at the menu page and lets the starter flag off an empty grid.  When the green button comes back, users of the car assigned no handicap could punch it, be deposited in their pit stall and off they'd go.  All other users would then wait for their assigned time to click off and then proceed.  Trouble is, GPL limits the amount of time that the green button is available that second time.  It's only two minutes.  For our Spa race, the Chaparral had a handicap of 3m45s.  In the test today, I watched from the viewport on the menu page as Axel, Evil and Alain Maurice motored away at the drop of the green flag.  My green button disappeared at the drop of the flag.  I waited the 15-16 seconds and the green button came back.  I didn't push it wanting to see how long it would stay available.  I was hoping that it was infinite.  No such luck.  It disappeared for a second and fianl time after two minutes.  That kills any chance of using the technique for longish handicaps.

This arrangement would work provided that the handicap didn't exceed two minutes(for the sake of a cushion, say, 118s; fumble the button strike and you ARE a DNS).  It could also be employed in a format that split the event into two heats with each being scored separately or combined on aggregate.
Logged
clouds
Full Member
***
Posts: 653



View Profile
« Reply #43 on: October 09, 2012, 11:31:46 AM +0100 »

I think the actual system could function if...several things have to be done well to make the system functioning perfectly, one of these if not the major is ...don't have hurry when coming to the pit stall because make a mistake here...means to be out. Having a good practice with this procedure is very important (like everything here in GPL). I would like to leave the refueling free just pressing <SHIFT>+<R> in the pit stall, but it is still unkown if there is something that could make this behaviour possible. (anyway I've used refueling stops at least in 2 races I only remeber we all had to add a file called minrace.lp to the GPL directory to make the refueling without respawn on the race line possible)
Logged

Sergio "Clouds" Lonzar

...Houston, we've had a problem here!

Jack Swigert, April 13rd, 1970. Apollo 13 on the way to the moon.
JonnyO
Full Member
***
Posts: 441


View Profile
« Reply #44 on: October 09, 2012, 09:33:41 PM +0100 »


 Grin
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Hosted by DaveGymer.com
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.308 seconds with 50 queries.
anything