Just so that everyone knows that I do sometimes consider different solutions.....lol
My intention in introducing pitstops was to try to make the actual racing last longer.
Because of the huge performance difference between the cars in GT's, it was pretty obvious that most races would be decided in the first 50% of the race as the faster cars and drivers eased away. I felt that drivers would be lucky to have any wheel to wheel racing for the last 30% of the race, which let us be honest, makes life a little boring huh?
I did consider an option like Garth has suggested, whereby we add the handicap time at the end of the race, but as Tim and Axel have already commented this would be rather artificial and require everyone to run prib and have a calculator alongside their steering wheel to work out where they might be in the race......not what I would call racing
.
I also wondered about something along the lines of Doni's idea, but discovered that would not work either..
I wish there was an easier way to make a pitstop that did not rely on parking your car in such a precise position, but I think that it is something that gets easier and more accurate with practice.
The only option that I have up my sleeve that would work for you drivers, but would make my moderator's job a nightmare, is to introduce multiple pitstops for the faster cars with no stop longer than 25 secs. As you will already have worked out...at least those of you who selected the 2F for Spa will have spotted this I am sure.
In a 15 lap race around Spa where the 2F needs to spend 225 secs in the pits you would be stopping almost every second lap, even if the time to get in and out of the pits was factored in. Plus drivers would need to remember how many stops they had done!!!
Just for comparison......
At present the 2F requires a single 225 second pit stop in a 15 lap race around Spa and this allows for 10 seconds lost in slowing down and speeding up again.
So, if we assume 6 stops that already accounts for 60 seconds ( 6 x slow down and speed up) leaving 175 seconds of stationary time that would mean each stop at around 29 seconds......maybe a fraction close to the 30 second disco point??
So 7 stops would be the way to go...7 x 10 seconds= 70, leaving 155 seconds of stationary time to be divided up...each of the 7 stops would be 22 secs. In a 15 lap race with a rolling start, that would put you in the pits on laps 2,4,6,8,10,12 and 14. Is that reasonable
It should certainly keep the leaders in close proximity throughout the whole race, but I fear that all of those stops would deter people from even trying the 2F or 2D? what do you guys think???