Quarterly cost: �0
 
nonchalant-unilinear
May 02, 2024, 10:35:17 PM +0100 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
Series
S4455GPP
S4455GPW
S4466CA
S4467F1P
S4467F1W
S4467F2A
S4467F2P
S44JSMT
Recent
S4467F1W Mont-Tremblant
S4467F1P Mont-Tremblant
S4467F2P Snetterton (L…
S4467F2A Snetterton (L…
S4455GPP Reims (1954-7…
S4455GPW Reims (1954-7…
S4466CA Michigan
Forthcoming
S4467F1W Aintree
S4467F1P Aintree
S4467F2P Sempione (193…
S4467F2A Sempione (193…
S4455GPP Oakes Field
S4455GPW Oakes Field
S4466CA Salzburgring
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register     LM2 Replays Rules Links Circuits Teams  
Linked Events
  • S19Gr Mosport: June 06, 2010
June 06, 2010, 10:45:39 PM +0100 - Mosport - UKGPL Season 19 (2010) Graduates Cup (67)
Driver
 Team
Nat. Make Model Class Qualifying Race
Tyres Pos Time/Gap Pos Time/Gap Laps Stops Best Retirement
reason
Ballast
Hristo Itchov
 HikiWazaRacing
Honda RA300 F1 1967 1 1:20.386
110.112mph
1 50:14.729
105.698mph
36 1:21.727
108.305mph
Firestone  
FullMetalGasket
 Black Night Racing
Ferrari 312 (1967) F1 1967 2 +1.279
108.387mph
2 +8.169
105.413mph
36 1:22.349
107.487mph
Firestone  
Al Heller
 Clark-Hill Racing
Brabham BT24 (Repco) F1 1967 5 +2.242
107.124mph
3 +32.906
104.557mph
36 1:22.978
106.672mph
Goodyear  
Podkrecony_Ziutek
 Clark-Hill Racing
Brabham BT24 (Repco) F1 1967 6 +2.456
106.847mph
4 +33.135
104.549mph
36 1:22.733
106.988mph
Goodyear  
Rick Nauman
 
Brabham BT24 (Repco) F1 1967 8 +2.701
106.532mph
5 +44.379
104.165mph
36 1:22.798
106.904mph
Goodyear  
EvilClive
 HikiWazaRacing
Honda RA300 F1 1967 4 +2.143
107.252mph
6 +53.557
103.853mph
36 1:22.796
106.906mph
Firestone  
Phil Thornton
 Antipasti Racing
Lotus 49 (Cosworth) F1 1967 7 +2.482
106.814mph
7 +55.696
103.781mph
36 1:22.674
107.064mph
Firestone  
Ronniepeterson
 
Ferrari 312 (1967) F1 1967 3 +2.037
107.390mph
8 +1:11.702
103.243mph
36 1:23.658
105.805mph
Firestone  
b_1_rd
 Clark-Hill Racing
Brabham BT24 (Repco) F1 1967 9 +3.621
105.365mph
9 +1L
100.578mph
35 1:23.759
105.677mph
Goodyear  
Billy Nobrakes
 Black Night Racing
Brabham BT24 (Repco) F1 1967 12 +4.761
103.955mph
10 +3L
95.464mph
33 1:27.189
101.520mph
Goodyear  
maestro57
 Black Night Racing
Brabham BT24 (Repco) F1 1967 11 +4.759
103.957mph
11 +3.541
95.354mph
33 1:25.133
103.972mph
Goodyear  
hannah
 
Brabham BT24 (Repco) F1 1967 17 +9.959
97.974mph
12 +5L
90.816mph
31 1:28.824
99.651mph
Disco
Goodyear  
vosblod
 Clark-Hill Racing
Lotus 49 (Cosworth) F1 1967 10 +4.024
104.862mph
13 +14L
100.867mph
22 1:24.337
104.953mph
accident
Firestone  
Michael Turner
 Soggy Bottom Racers Club
Ferrari 312 (1967) F1 1967 13 +5.641
102.891mph
14 +20L
98.672mph
16 1:25.424
103.618mph
Disco
Firestone  
bernie
 Soggy Bottom Racers Club
BRM P115 F1 1967 16 +7.928
100.227mph
15 +28L
91.485mph
8 1:27.175
101.536mph
Disco
Goodyear  
Nigel Smith
 
Ferrari 312 (1967) F1 1967 19 16 +30L
90.054mph
6 1:26.403
102.443mph
Disco
Firestone  
G Poole
 Black Night Racing
Brabham BT24 (Repco) F1 1967 14 +6.277
102.136mph
17 +35L
86.217mph
1 1:34.948
93.224mph
Disco
Goodyear  
Nigel Smith
 
Lotus 49 (Cosworth) F1 1967 15 +6.614
101.741mph
18 DNS ---
---
Firestone  
maestro57
 Black Night Racing
Brabham BT24 (Repco) F1 1967 19 ---
---
Goodyear  
2 UKGPL_T7
 
Lotus 49 (Cosworth) F1 1967 18 20 ---
---
Firestone  

Moderator's Report

In the Works Hristo led FMG and Al H whilst over in the Privates Ronnie led Billy and Pete.
One mention, at 2 minutes in there was an incident with Mike T crossing back after passing Graham. Just a reminder you need to check in your mirrors you have cleared the other driver before crossing back - this wasn't a reported incident so just advice.

One reminder re Incident Reports. Where it says in the header 'PLEASE ENTER A BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INCIDENT' please clear this and put in a one liner; this is the only part of your report your opposite number will see and it's useful if they can see what the issue is.


Server replay time: 0h02m43s

Graham and Mike T. Steve passes Graham who slows to let him by and Mike spins and hits Graham.
Mike did try to brake and Graham slowed unexpectedly hence a Caution only.
Advice to Graham not to slow down to let a faster car though, if they are genuinely quicker they will get through anyway if you don't take a defensive line. However onus must be on following car.


Server replay time: 0h33m11s

Hannah and Vosblod.Vos hits Hannah.
Hannah was travelling slowly and Vos braked when he realised this but contact was made. Vosblod's race was ended but Hannah could continue.
The penalty guidelines are there for the standard cases but there always has to be an element of interpretation. A caution for Vos here with the advice to take extra care when trying to lap very slow cars. Try not to brake line astern; always try to brake on a different line in case the slower car brakes very early. Also plan to overtake under acceleration where there is much less chance of contact.

Pages: 1 [2] 3
  Print  
Author Topic: UKGPL Season 19 (2010) Graduates Cup (67) - Mosport - Jun 6  (Read 7056 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
b_1_rd
Former UKGPL Moderators
Full Member
**
Posts: 1182


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: June 07, 2010, 01:24:06 PM +0100 »

Shocking race for me.  I had some setup issues which me left me changing to an unfamiler setup just before the race.

Had a couple of incidents early on.  L1 I tagged Rick at the hairpin, which I think he managed to control and got away ok, I was also hit myslef and it spun me around but jut a racing incident so no big issue with it.  Also had a small coming together with Ronnie (I think) when he partially lost control at the top of the hill into the hairpin and I made a meal of a recovery to the track which held me up again! About half a million errors later I got home a lap down in 9th!

Never mind! Live and learn.
Logged

Steve

Remember, you’re an individual, just like everyone else.
vosblod
Former UKGPL Moderators
Sr. Member
**
Posts: 3488

can divide by zero


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: June 07, 2010, 03:15:40 PM +0100 »

Main issue here seems to be about running mixed grids. I can see pros and cons but probably best to pick that up on the Mid Season review thread.
I agree two sides to this one both with valid points.
Anyway something to be looked at prior to next season but I am keen to encourage as many as possible to participate hence the creation of Works and Privateers.
Whatever we decide (big grids with everyone v small grids with similar ability), I think the criteria needs to be start in the Novices unless/until you can get round in the 67's safely regardless of your speed. That's not to say you have to be perfect and never make mistakes, if it was I wouldn't be participating  Wink
Logged
Rick Nauman
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 110


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: June 07, 2010, 05:06:19 PM +0100 »

Finally had a decent race in the Works division after some DNFs and no-shows.  Didn't qualy as well as I should have but same for everyone... blah blah.  Had a good start and was in the parade leading into Moss.  Lost one spot to Vos in the scrum there but he graciously let me pass shortly thereafter.  Actually let me by twice after I botched the right after the back straight.  Was then in P6 trailing the threesome of Al, Pod and Phil at about 8 seconds.  Closed it to 4 sec when Phil had an off.  Rest of the race was me and Phil trading offs and positions.  I think the score was 3 to 2 in my favor and so I ended up ahead in P5 with about 5 to go.  Finished the race in P5.  Happy enough just to see the checkers.

I agree the split divisions are a problem.  I was irate after Monaco.  In this race most of my passes of back markers or privateers were OK although a couple could have ended badly.  But I'm on the side of finding a way to not combine the grids.  I also can see that some of the privateers are at or not too far from works caliber and have a lot of experience.  If we draw the line properly maybe only a small handful of 67 newbies would be left behind and the works ranks will not be too small to have some exciting and competitive races.  Those newbies could then hone their 67 skills off line.  After all the shortcoming is, in my estimation, mostly one of car control and confidence.  On line racing experience by these drivers could be gained at the same time by racing the small but matched competition remaining in the privateers or a 65 division.

Just my 2 cents.. or should that be 2 pence?
« Last Edit: June 07, 2010, 05:09:30 PM +0100 by Rick Nauman » Logged
bernie
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3273


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: June 07, 2010, 11:00:08 PM +0100 »

The 65 cars are not a good training ground for 67's IMO .

65's are very easily controllable plus the 65 collision model allows much closer racing than with the 67's

It is the responsibilty of those doing the overtaking to decide where and when a clean pass can be made . The person being lapped should keep to the normal racing line and apply the brakes as normalfor a corner .

Can help by lifting off on the next straight

Any sudden moves , early braking , swerving to the side to "help" the following car can only confuse those trying to overtake , cos they cant read YOUR thoughts and they aint PHSYCIC ( that includes me)  Roll Eyes

 

Logged
Ronniepeterson
Full Member
***
Posts: 1212


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: June 08, 2010, 02:55:46 PM +0100 »

Two grids, one grid, I don't care as long as I get to race 67 cars. Any suggestion that people should stick to 65 cars or worse still be banished to offline racing sound a little elitist to me.

Hopefully there are enough for two grids in the future but when it is one grid surely the Works drivers don't expect people to just pull over for them do they?? We are meant to be racing after all. Stellar drive by Hristo by the way, was that Honda turbo charged!!

On the subject of that coming together Al. Its was the last place I expected you to make a pass. I saw you come along side but by then I was commited to my line, sorry. Neither of us meant to make contact, I'm sure. Sorry if I prevented a higher finish for you. Honest, I was gonna let you thru on the back straight that lap as you were clearly faster and I was only going to hold us both up with you behind me.



Logged
Al Heller
Former UKGPL Moderators
Full Member
**
Posts: 495



View Profile
« Reply #20 on: June 08, 2010, 03:49:18 PM +0100 »

On the subject of that coming together Al. Its was the last place I expected you to make a pass. I saw you come along side but by then I was commited to my line, sorry. Neither of us meant to make contact, I'm sure. Sorry if I prevented a higher finish for you. Honest, I was gonna let you thru on the back straight that lap as you were clearly faster and I was only going to hold us both up with you behind me.

Yes I'm sorry about that too Ronnie - hopefully you agree that it was a racing incident. It was almost a carbon-copy of an incident I had at a pre-season fun race at Zandvoort but that time I was in your position so I understand both viewpoints now Tongue. As I say, I was pleased that you were able to continue & grab a well-deserved Privateers win as you were right on the pace. I got off scot-free with no damage & no delay so it didn't have any effect on my race. angel

I do wish GPL had more peripheral vision though as in real-life racing you'd have spotted me coming up the inside. I wouldn't normally have tried it there but I'd been looking for a way past for a few laps & was under increasing pressure from the guys closing up behind. Then you went very wide on the exit of T2 so that gave me the chance to pull alongside into a nice big gap but unfortunately that disappeared when you turned in. Obviously I didn't know you were planning to let me through later but Ronnie there's no rule that says you have to let any Works guys past... as you say we are racing Wink.
Logged
Hristo Itchov
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3977


There is no limit!


View Profile WWW
« Reply #21 on: June 08, 2010, 04:11:04 PM +0100 »

I do wish GPL had more peripheral vision

You can always increase the Field of View (FoV) above the default 78 and get to see more on the sides of your cockpit, but I find it hardly drivable.
Logged

Al Heller
Former UKGPL Moderators
Full Member
**
Posts: 495



View Profile
« Reply #22 on: June 08, 2010, 06:58:50 PM +0100 »

I do wish GPL had more peripheral vision

You can always increase the Field of View (FoV) above the default 78 and get to see more on the sides of your cockpit, but I find it hardly drivable.

Hmmm thanks, I didn't realise you could do that - might have to have a look. As you say though, might be difficult to adapt to it after so long using the default setting.
Logged
Doni Yourth
Full Member
***
Posts: 1296


View Profile
« Reply #23 on: June 09, 2010, 01:37:00 AM +0100 »

Get the utility, GPLShift.  It gives you 45° & 122° Look Left/Right views on a G25.  It's saved my bacon any number of times.

Logged
Rick Nauman
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 110


View Profile
« Reply #24 on: June 09, 2010, 05:16:27 AM +0100 »

Any suggestion that people should stick to 65 cars or worse still be banished to offline racing sound a little elitist to me.

Elitist?  Really?  The suggestion to gain online skill in an easier chassis or junior division while you hone your 67 skills practicing off line can hardly be called banishment.  What's wrong with gaining a minimum 67 skill level before jumping into competition with upper level and mid level veterans?  I spent over a year of intense off line practice before I ever thought of joining a league, or even knew there were leagues.

Elitist?... I'm trying to think of a label for the other side of this coin.  What's the opposite of courteous?

...surely the Works drivers don't expect people to just pull over for them do they?? We are meant to be racing after all.

Your skill level is quite high (obviously deserving of a works ride, IMO) and trying to get around you can be great fun... for a while.  But if you're preventing a driver in the other "race" from gaining on the the guy he is actually in competition with then the answer seems obvious.
Logged
bernie
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3273


View Profile
« Reply #25 on: June 09, 2010, 10:54:09 AM +0100 »

Quote
What's the opposite of courteous?

I could tell you , but it would be discourteous of me to say  Wink
Logged
Hristo Itchov
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3977


There is no limit!


View Profile WWW
« Reply #26 on: June 09, 2010, 12:48:06 PM +0100 »

the Works drivers don't expect people to just pull over for them do they?? We are meant to be racing after all

It's exactly the opposite that I'm asking for, I want to see drivers keep their regular pace, not panic when there's a car in their mirrors or around them, not brake suddenly and move to the side abruptly and unexpectedly, not throw themselves off into the gravel/grass to make way, not cruise on straights to let someone by, etc. etc. etc.

Apart from that, I would like to see some threshold for speed difference. I'm sorry, but you can't have people who are 10 seconds off the pace and going 50 km/h slower in corners than others race together. It just doesn't work and it only brings frustration. Neither side learns or gains anything. From that point of view bigger grids are irrelevant.

I've spent 2 years offline playing GPL before I ever raced online and it paid off. I'm not asking for people to repeat this, but there are pick up races, there are newbie divisions, there are AI races even. Until someone feels comfortable and consistent enough, it's unrealistic to put them into a division such as D1/Graduates.
« Last Edit: June 09, 2010, 12:49:58 PM +0100 by Hristo Itchov » Logged

Rick Nauman
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 110


View Profile
« Reply #27 on: June 09, 2010, 02:34:48 PM +0100 »

I could tell you , but it would be discourteous of me to say  Wink

 Cheesy   I had a few stronger words in mind.
Logged
Ronniepeterson
Full Member
***
Posts: 1212


View Profile
« Reply #28 on: June 09, 2010, 03:06:22 PM +0100 »

Sorry if I upset anyone, I just have a different opinion on racing and speed trials and which one belongs offline. I'm not saying I'm right or wrong its just my opinion. I have no wish to get involved in a slanging match. Think what you want.
Logged
Statmeister
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 54



View Profile
« Reply #29 on: June 15, 2010, 03:28:29 PM +0100 »

Results from round 6. Interestingly all 8 Works drivers that started the race made it to the finish. A perfect consistency score from Mosport would have been 180.

Privateers:


Works:
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Hosted by DaveGymer.com
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.113 seconds with 60 queries.